Working
Time Regulations 1998. SI
1998 No.1833 - Health Aspects
1
Introduction
The opinions
expressed in this document are those of the author, a specialist in
occupational medicine and former member of the HSE.
The reader may wish to refer to legal or human resources experts
for additional information. Section
2
is adapted from the DTI website: http://www.dti.gov.uk/er/work_time_regs/index.htm
and some text has been underlined for emphasis.
In all cases the Regulations have been paraphrased and the exact
wording will be found in the Statutory Instrument; http://www.hmso.gov.uk/si/si1998/19981833.htm
. Specific comments appear in boxes
2.1
Purpose of the Regulations
The Regulations
will implement the EC Working Time Directive (93/104/EC) and the EC
Young Workers Directive (94/33/EC) as far as it relates to adolescents.
2.2
Coverage
The Regulations
apply to workers over the minimum school leaving age.
The definition
of a worker covers those with a contract of employment plus a wider
group who undertake work under other forms of contract (e.g. agency and
temporary workers, freelance etc) but does not cover the self-employed.
The Regulations exclude skilled workers involved in the following
activities or sectors of activity: transport; sea fishing, or other work
at sea; and doctors in training. It
also excludes certain activities of the armed forces, police and civil
protection services.
There are some
special provisions which relate to adolescent (young) workers, these are
workers who are
over the minimum school leaving age (15) but under 18.
2.3
Weekly working hours limits
The Regulations
will set a working time limit of an average of 48 hours per week.
The standard averaging period is 17 weeks, but can be extended to
26 weeks if the workers are covered by one of the "exceptions"
or up to 52 weeks by an agreement between employers and workers.
Individuals can
voluntarily agree to disapply the weekly working hours limits.
Where workers choose to do this, employers are required to
maintain records of the hours they have worked.
2.4
Measures relating to night time working.
Night workers
are subject to a working time limit of an average of eight hours
in each 24 hour period. The
standard averaging period is again 17 weeks but can be extended by one
of the "exceptions" or by agreement between employers and
workers.
Night workers
whose work involves special hazards or heavy physical or mental strain
are subject to an eight hour limit for each 24 hour period.
Adult night
workers are entitled to health assessments (an adolescent worker to a
health and capacities assessment) before being required to perform night
work and periodically thereafter.
2.5
Rest breaks and periods
Adult workers
will be entitled to one day off each week (Reg 11).
Adolescent workers are entitled to two days off (11(3)).
Adult workers will be entitled to 11 hours consecutive rest per
day (10(1)). The adolescent
workers are entitled to 12 hours consecutive rest per day (10(2)).
Adult workers will be entitled to a minimum 20 minutes rest break
if their working day is longer than six hours (12(3)).
Adolescent workers are entitled to a minimum 30 minutes rest
break if they work for longer than 4.5 hours (12(4)).
These
provisions are subject to "exceptions" which provide
flexibility in certain circumstances.
2.6
Paid annual leave
Workers will be
entitled to three weeks paid annual leave (rising to four weeks in
November 1999). For workers
who have just started work with an employer, their entitlement does not
arise until a 13 week qualifying period has been completed.
3
Exceptions
Selected
examples.
3.1
Unmeasured working time
Covers workers
whose working time is not measured or predetermined or can be determined
by themselves. Examples of
those that may fall into this category are managing executives and
family workers. Effectively these workers will only be subject to the paid
annual leave provisions.
3.2
Specified circumstances
Flexibility is
on the basis that workers receive compensatory rest.
The specified circumstances include security and surveillance
activities, activities involving the need for continuity of service or
production (such as dock worker, hospital services, the provision of
utilities, civil protection services, agriculture, etc) and where there
is a foreseeable surge of activity such as in tourism.
3.3
Force majeure
Unexpected and
unpredictable occurrences beyond the employers control.
3.4
Employer/worker agreements
“Collective
agreement” can be made with the independent trade union.
"Work force agreements" can be made with workers where
there is no recognised trade union.
The workforce can either individually sign the agreement (where a
firm employs 20 workers or less) or the work force can elect
representatives to negotiate on their behalf.
The Regulations provide a mechanism for representatives to be
chosen.
4
Enforcement
The limits
(e.g. the weekly working time and night work limits) and the health
assessments in the Regulations will be enforced by the Health and Safety
enforcing authorities i.e. the
Health and Safety Executive and Local Authorities.
The
entitlements (e.g. the rest periods and breaks and the paid annual
leave) will be enforced by Employment (industrial) Tribunals.
5
Health and the Working Time Regulations
5.1
Background
Shift work,
long hours, night work and lack of rest breaks have been implicated in
the causation of ill-health. However,
there is limited medical evidence to show that any particular pattern of
work actually causes illness.
Research into
the health problems associated with shift work, night work or long hours
can be difficult for two main reasons
1.
Workers who experience ill health because of these types of work
may choose to leave and find alternative jobs and therefore fail to be
included in studies.
2.
Workers who choose shift work, night work or longer hours may be
different to other workers in their personality or habits (smoking,
drinking, caffeine, diet, and exercise) and this could account for
ill-health rather than the work itself.
Harrington
published a review of shift workers and health in 1978
The main conclusions are reproduced in a later study by Waterhouse,
Folkard and Minors
which reviewed the scientific literature between 1978 and 1990 on shift
work, health and safety. The
main conclusions, including those of Harrington are reproduced at Appendix
1.
More
recent studies comparing 8 hour shifts with 12 hour shifts (working the
same total hours) suggested few differences in the way that they
affected people.
Another
study showed no increase in the risk of death from ischaemic heart
disease in manual shift workers compared with day workers.
Research
into the effects of long working hours (as opposed to shift work) on
health and safety has been fairly limited. Some evidence exists to suggest that working in excess of 50
hours per week is associated with higher levels of heart disease and
mental health disorders. However
little is known of the effects on other body systems.
Productivity
and safety may also be adversely affected by working long hours.
Despite the
limitations of the medical evidence it is under the arrangements for the
protection of workers health
that the Working Time Directive and the Young Workers Directive have to
be implemented by member states.
5.2
Where is health mentioned in the Regulations?
Health is
mentioned a number of times in the Regulations.
Employers have
to “take all reasonable steps, in keeping with the need to protect the
health and safety of workers”, to ensure that weekly working
hours limits are complied with (regulation 4(2)) and limits on night
workers hours are complied with (Regulation (6(2)).
Night workers
must have the opportunity of a free health assessment (Regulation
7(1)).
Rest breaks
have to be given if the pattern of work places the employees’ health
at risk (Regulation 8)
6
Interpretation of the Regulations
Regulation 2
provides a legal interpretation of a number of terms used elsewhere in
the Regulations.
The DTI have
produced a guide to the Regulations.
The guide has the status of Official Guidance.
Following the guidance is likely to result in compliance with the
law. However the
introduction states “The booklet explains how the Regulations work and
how an employer may seek to comply with them…….The booklet
gives only general guidance and should not be regarded as a complete or
authoritative statement of the law”
Night-time
means a seven hour period which includes the hours between midnight and
5am. The precise
start and finish of "night-time" will be determined by a
"relevant agreement" with the work force or, failing this,
will be 11pm to 6am.
6.1
Night Workers
Night workers
are those who, as a normal course, work at least three hours of their
daily working time during "night-time".
The Regulations
state that "a person works hours as a normal course (without
prejudice to the generality of that expression) if he works such hours
on the majority of days on which he works".
Night workers
can also be defined as those who are likely to work more than a certain
proportion of their annual hours during night time - as set out in a
collective or workforce agreement.
Therefore
regulation 2 defines "normal course" as "the majority
of days" which can be taken to mean 50 per cent or more of the
total days worked. However,
inclusion of "(without prejudice to the generality of that
expression)" suggests that “normal course” could mean
something other than "the majority".
The
DTI guide in section 3.1.3 it states "the worker may be said to
work at night ‘as a normal course’ if they do so on a regular
basis, for example on a rotating shift pattern that results in them
working regularly during night time as opposed to an infrequent or
ad-hoc basis".
There
is some doubt, therefore, as to whether a worker employed on a typical
6-2 2-10 10-6 three shift system would be counted as a night worker in
the absence of a workforce agreement to that effect.
The worker will only work during night-time on one-third of
shifts (i.e. not the majority) but the night work will occur as a
normal course. Extra
night shifts worked as overtime would not count unless this happened
as "a normal course".
This
and similar matters may be clarified in the courts.
Night workers
have certain protections, enforced by HSE, not to work more than eight
hours in 24 averaged over a reference period.
The employer must take "all reasonable steps, in keeping
with the need to protect the health and safety of workers, to ensure
that this limit is complied with".
Would
it be a “reasonable step” to prevent the worker from attending for
or completing his shift if the employer becomes aware that he has done
a day shift in another employment?
Or could it be ignored because such an action could not be
shown to protect the workers health and safety?
Employers must
ensure that no night worker employed by him whose work involves special
hazards or heavy physical or mental strain is allowed to work more than
eight hours in any 24-hour period during which the night worker
performs night work.
There
is no provision for the employee to exempt himself from this rule,
except under a workforce agreement (Regulation 23). The correct identification of night workers will be
particularly important in these cases.
Special hazards
and heavy physical or mental strain are anything defined as such in a
collective or work force agreement OR work identified in the process of
risk assessments under regulation 3 of the Management of Health and
Safety at Work Regulations as involving a significant risk to health or
safety.
This
is a misleading definition since the employer has a legal duty to
eliminate or reduce those risks or protect employees from them, even
in the absence of the Working Time Regulations.
6.2
Health Assessments
Employers have
to ensure that workers have the “opportunity” of a free health
assessment before taking up an assignment as a night worker and at
"appropriate" regular intervals after that.
For young workers their “capacities” will also be assessed.
In the
Regulations:
The
content of the health assessment is not specified.
The
practitioner performing
the health assessment is not specified
The
purpose of the health assessment is not specified although it is
implied later in regulation 7(5)(a) – see below.
The
frequency of the health assessment is not specified.
The
law does not specifically state or imply that the health assessment
should be relevant to the particular (night) work being done.
The
law does not require that the outcome of the health assessment be
communicated to the employer – though it does permit it (Reg.
7(5)(a)
There
is no requirement to tell the employee that he has the opportunity of
a free health assessment,
providing the opportunity exists.
There is no requirement to offer a health assessment
The
employee is not obliged to participate in or attend for a health
assessment.
In section 4.1
the DTI guide goes a lot further than the Regulations themselves:
The
guidance states:
An
employer must offer a health assessment
The
purpose of the health assessment is to determine fitness to carry out
night work.
The
minimum procedure should be a screening questionnaire compiled with
the help of a qualified health professional.
Only properly trained people should interpret the information -
(it does not specify a doctor or nurse,
however the information obtained is likely to be medically
confidential).
The
guide implies that, if the screening questionnaire indicates it is
necessary, then a formal assessment will be conducted by the
employers own occupational health
service or a general practitioner or external providers of
occupational health services.
A
simple fitness for work statement should be provided by the health
care professionals to the employer.
Regular
intervals are not defined but annual is "a rule of thumb"
If
the purpose of the health assessment is to assess an individual's
fitness to perform night work for the purpose of protecting his or her
health then the fact that the health assessment is optional is
inconsistent with other similar health assessments carried out under
health and safety legislation. One
possible exception is the eye test offered under the Display
Screen Equipment
Regulations
The only
disclosure to be made as a result of a free health assessment is that
the worker is fit to take up or continue the assignment, unless
consent is given to other disclosure.
This
implies that the health assessment is an assessment of fitness to
work.
Disclosure that the individual is unfit is not allowed – unless
consent has been given. This
could have the effect of employers being unaware that an individual
was unfit to perform night work and, therefore, allowing him/her to
commence or continue the assignment.
In order
to avoid breaking the law in the case of night worker health
assessments the practitioner might decline to certify the individual
as fit, rather than saying they were unfit.
In reality
it is likely that occupational health practitioners will continue with
the recognised practice of advising an employer whether an individual
is fit OR unfit for a particular job (night work or otherwise) while
protecting all confidential information unless consent is given for
its release.
If
a doctor advises the employer that a workers health problems are
connected with night work then the worker must be transferred to other
work so he ceases to be a night worker.
But this need only occur if the worker is suited to the
work and it is possible to transfer him.
(Enforced by HSE/LA)
This
can be any doctor, not just the company doctor and the advice can be
given in any way - not necessarily in writing.
"Health
problem" could conceivably be any symptom, not necessarily a
specific diagnosis. The
word "connected" is not defined and is much broader than
"caused by" or "made worse by"
If
the employee told his doctor that he had more frequent headaches or
heartburn or insomnia when he worked at night, and his GP advised the
employer of this then a duty under regulation 7(6)
to transfer to other suitable work would arise.
The
duty can be ignored if it is not "possible" to transfer
or if the worker is not “suited” to the alternative duties.
Once
the employer has been advised of a "connection" between a
health problem and night work then the employee must be transferred to
suitable non- night work if it is possible.
This is a protection not a right and cannot be waived by the
employee.
6.4
Rest breaks from work with health risks
Where
work is organised in a pattern that places an employee’s health and
safety at risk (particularly monotonous or pre-determined rate) then
adequate rest breaks should be given.
Other
legislation would require that risks arising from the pattern of work
be eliminated or controlled.
6.5
Records of Health Assessments
Employers
must make records to show that the requirements in regulation 7(1) and
(2) are being complied with and keep records for two years from the date
when they were made. (Also
applies to 4(1) and 6(1) and (7)).
7
Recommendations for health assessments
Employers
with existing occupational health arrangements (having regular contact
with an occupational health nurse or doctor) should have no difficulty
complying with these regulations because all of their employees have the
opportunity of a free health assessment. In order to comply with the spirit of the DTI Guidance
employers may wish to publicise their arrangements to the workforce
collectively but an offer to
each employee on an individual basis is not a legal requirement.
Rather
than looking at night work specifically a broader approach to assessment
of fitness for work is advocated to ensure that all employees are
fit and safe to carry out their duties.
Special arrangements for night workers should not be required.
This can be considered to be compliance with Section 2 of the
Health and Safety at Work Act and would have the effect of complying
with Regulations 6 and 7 of the Working Time Regulations.
All
employees should have a health assessment pre employment and before
transfer. The type and
content of the assessment will depend on the type of work to be done and
the health risks. Occupational
health doctors and nurses can assist with the development of company
policy.
Further
assessment may be required at intervals to check that employees are fit
for specific duties, for example driving, or to ensure that work is not
harming their health, for example hearing tests.
Normally
a general questionnaire should be in use at the pre employment and pre
transfer stage with interpretation by an occupational health nurse or
doctor and subsequent more detailed assessments where considered
necessary - the employees duties would be taken into account.
Checks
should be made to ensure that the general questionnaire is suitable to
detect significant medical conditions that may be relevant to a range of
jobs, including those that involve night work.
The employer needs to be advised whether the individual is fit
for their duties and what (if any) restrictions apply.
If
the above system is in place then all employees can be assessed prior to
commencing their duties, including night work.
8
Summary
The
Regulations are intended for the protection of workers health.
Medical
evidence to show that longer hours, night work or shift work adversely
affect health is limited and difficult to interpret.
The
Department of Trade and industry guidance goes beyond the legal
requirements of the Regulations. Employers
can choose to comply in other ways.
The
term night worker is ambiguous and the Regulations may have to be tested
in the courts – if any enforcement action should arise.
Health
Assessments for night workers should form part of the normal pre
employment, pre transfer and periodic medical assessment programme.
Any
employer with existing arrangements for occupational health provision
can fairly claim that all employees have the opportunity
of a free health assessment at any time.
Employees or managers who have concerns about fitness for work
can seek the advice of the occupational health doctor or nurse.
Employers
with no provision should ask a suitably qualified doctor or nurse to
review their occupational health needs.
D
Shackleton MB ChB MRCP MFOM
January
1999
Appendix
1
NB:
Heading numbering relates to the original report[2].
Background and Introduction
In
his review of shift work and health, Harrington (1978) drew the
following broad conclusions:
i
There was, on balance, no evidence for an increased mortality in
shift workers, nor for an increased incidence of cardiovascular and
neurological disorders; by contrast, chronic fatigue, gastric and
duodenal ulcers were more common. The
results for absenteeism were extremely difficult to interpret.
ii
Repetitive
tasks, associated with low motivation and fatigue, were performed less
well. at night, but tasks which were more interesting
and required more mental effort on the part of the individual
suffered less at night. Any
link that might exist between poor performance and accidents did not
extend to a clear relationship between time of day and accidents.
iii
Differences between workers existed in their response to shift
work and tolerance of
it;
Harrington suggested that 10% of shift workers enjoyed night work, most
accepted it and about 20% found it unpleasant enough to choose (or be
forced by health considerations) to leave night work.
This last sub-group, often called “drop outs”, seemed to
suffer most from the ill effects of night work.
iv
There were many reasons for these differences in response between
workers. They
included
differences in physiology, psychology and the social environment on the
individual.
C.
Shiftwork and Health
6. Mortality
The main study
of mortality (all causes) conducted in 1972 was interpreted to indicate
that there was no increased mortality for current shift workers compared
with the average for the population as a whole.
However, the report did find an increased incidence amongst
former shift workers as well as a greater incidence amongst current
shift workers as compared to day workers; nowadays there would be a
tendency to give increased stress to the latter findings.
7. Cardiovascular Disorders
Harrington’s
view that the evidence showing a link between shift work and an increase
in cardiovascular disease was inconclusive.
However, papers published since Harrington’s 1978 review have
generally been more likely to find an increase in cardiovascular
disorders, particularly in “former shift workers”.
The evidence in favour of the view that shift work is associated
with an increase in cardiovascular disease is now becoming more
difficult to dismiss as inconclusive, than was the case in 1978.
The possible causes are not yet clear.
Possibilities include increase in body mass, blood pressure and
smoking.
8. Digestive Disorders and Ulcers
Further
evidence has confirmed that shift workers have an increased incidence of
these disorders. The causes
of this are likely to be multiple, but diet, smoking, drinking alcohol
and general stress have all been suggested, in addition to irregular
meal times. The relative contribution of each factor remains to be
determined.
9.
Neurological Disorders
There
are comparatively few studies which do not suffer from major design
defects, and which have considered these symptoms.
Such studies provide evidence for a greater tendency towards
general malaise - including anxiety and depression elements - in shift
workers than in day working colleagues. It is unclear as to which physiological and biochemical
change is produced by shift work are
exacerbated by social factors in contributing to this result. It is worth remembering that about 10% of shift workers enjoy
night work.
10.
Sleep Loss
This is
accepted as a major problem for shift workers.
Fatigue increases during the night shift and can be almost as
marked on the morning shift. Decreased
amounts of sleep have been shown repeatedly using results from
questionnaires as well as from the objective assessment of sleep
electroencephalographically. The reasons for sleep loss are often environmental and
social, but laboratory based studies have indicated some physiological
reasons also why such difficulties arise.
It is not known if continual partial sleep deprivation is a cause
of increased mortality and morbidity, though one large study suggests it
might be. It seems
advantageous to the shift worker to be able to catch up at least some of
the lost sleep.
11.
Differences between individuals
Differences
appear to exist both initially and in the extent to which successful
coping mechanisms are used by shift workers, though there is an
interaction between these factors.
Some of the differences are: age of the workers; whether the body
clock is phased particularly earlier or later than average; the
abilities to overcome feelings of drowsiness and to take naps when there
is an opportunity. In
addition, it appears to be particularly important that the individual
reorganises his or her lifestyle so that the advantages of shift work,
rather than its disadvantages, are stressed.
Such coping mechanism involve a choice of priorities and affect
the workers spouse, family and friends.
12.
Special Groups
In addition to
those disadvantaged by the factors considered in paragraph 11 above, it
is generally suggested that certain groups of workers should be advised
against shift work. These
include: those on chronic medication where dose scheduling is critical;
those with gastrointestinal or cardiovascular disorders; and people with
epilepsy. It is also generally advised that from the fourth decade of
life onwards, regular health checks should be available.